Children's attitude problems: Bootstrapping verb meaning from syntax and pragmatics
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning
Can infants use the syntactic context of an unknown word to infer that it is a verb, and thus refers to an action? Twenty-three-month-old French infants watching a moving object were taught novel verbs, within sentences that contained only function words (e.g. “il poune par là” / “it’s pooning there”). Infants then watched two instances of the object undergoing either the familiar or a novel ac...
متن کاملExplaining meaning: The interplay of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics
Introduction Traditionally, one of the usages of the prefix po(often called delimitative or attenuative) is associated with some characteristic of an event being lower than the expected value: an event lasting for a short period of time, a small quantity of the theme consumed, etc. According to Filip (2000, pp. 47–48) “[t]he prefix pocontributes to the verb the [. . .] meaning of a small quanti...
متن کاملTurkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning.
How might syntactic bootstrapping apply in Turkish, which employs inflectional morphology to indicate grammatical relations and allows argument ellipsis? We investigated whether Turkish speakers interpret constructions differently depending on the number of NPs in the sentence, the presence of accusative case marking and the causative morpheme. Data were collected from 60 child speakers and 16 ...
متن کاملMeaning to Learn: Bootstrapping Semantics to Infer Syntax
Context-free grammars cannot be identified in the limit from positive examples (Gold 1967), yet natural language grammars are more powerful than context-free grammars and humans learn them with remarkable ease from positive examples (Marcus 1993). Identifiability results for formal languages ignore a potentially powerful source of information available to learners of natural languages, namely, ...
متن کاملPragmatics and Word Meaning
In this paper, we explore the interaction between lexical semantics and pragmatics. We argue that linguistic processing is informationally encapsulated and utilises relatively simple ‘taxonomic’ lexical semantic knowledge. On this basis, defeasible lexical generalisations deliver defeasible parts of logical form. In contrast, pragmatic inference is openended and involves arbitrary real-world kn...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mind & Language
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0268-1064,1468-0017
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12192